Cochrane v. Deener
From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
| Cochrane v. Deener | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
| Decided March 19, 1877 | |||||
| Full case name | Cochrane v. Deener | ||||
| Citations | 94 U.S. 780 (more)
24 L. Ed. 139; 1876 U.S. LEXIS 1942; 4 Otto 780
|
||||
| Court membership | |||||
|
|||||
| Case opinions | |||||
| Majority | Bradley, joined by Waite, Swayne, Miller, Davis, Field, Hunt | ||||
| Dissent | Clifford, joined by Strong | ||||
Cochrane v. Deener, 94 U.S. 780 (1876), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a process transforming grain meal into purified flour was patentable.[1]
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
Cite error: Invalid <references> tag; parameter "group" is allowed only.
<references />, or <references group="..." />External links
- ↑ Cochrane v. Deener, 94 U.S. 780, 785-88 (1876)
