Eight Consciousnesses

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

The Eight Consciousnesses is a classification developed in the tradition of the Yogacara school of Buddhism. They enumerate the five senses, supplemented by the mind, defilements of the mind, and finally the fundamental store-house consciousness, which is the basis of the other seven.[citation needed]

The eightfold network of primary consciousnesses

All surviving schools of buddhist thought accept – "in common" – the existence of the first six primary consciousnesses (Sanskrit: vijñāna, Tibetan: རྣམ་ཤེས་, Wylie: rnam-shes).[1] The internally coherent Yogācāra school associated with Maitreya, Asaṅga, and Vasubandhu, however, uniquely – or "uncommonly" – also posits the existence of two additional primary consciousnesses, kliṣṭamanas and ālayavijñāna, in order to explain the workings of karma.[2] The first six of these primary consciousnesses comprise the five sensory faculties together with mental consciousness, which is counted as the sixth.[3] According to Gareth Sparham,

The ālaya-vijñāna doctrine arose on the Indian subcontinent about one thousand years before Tsong kha pa. It gained its place in a distinctly Yogācāra system over a period of some three hundred years stretching from 100 to 400 C.E., culminating in the Mahāyānasaṃgraha, a short text by Asaṅga (circa 350), setting out a systematic presentation of the ālaya-vijñāna doctrine developed over the previous centuries. It is the doctrine found in this text in particular that Tsong kha pa, in his Ocean of Eloquence, treats as having been revealed in toto by the Buddha and transmitted to suffering humanity through the Yogācāra founding saints (Tib. shing rta srol byed): Maitreya[-nātha], Asaṅga, and Vasubandhu.[2]

While some noteworthy modern scholars of the Gelug tradition (which was originally founded by Tsongkhapa's reforms to Atisha's Kadam school) assert that the ālayavijñāna is posited only in the Yogācāra philosophical tenet system, all non-Gelug schools of Tibetan buddhism maintain that the ālayavijñāna is accepted by the various Madhyamaka schools, as well.[4] The Yogācāra eightfold network of primary consciousnesses – aṣṭavijñāna in Sanskrit (from compounding aṣṭa, "eight", with vijñāna, "primary consciousness"), or Tibetan: རྣམ་ཤེས་ཚོགས་བརྒྱད་, Wylie: rnam-shes tshogs-brgyad –  is roughly sketched out in the following table.

The Eightfold Network of Primary Consciousnesses[1]
Subgroups Name[lower-greek 1] of Consciousness[lower-greek 2] Associated Nonstatic Phœnomena[lower-greek 3] in terms of Three Circles of Action[lower-greek 4]
English Sanskrit Tibetan Chinese Physical Form[lower-greek 5] Type of Cognition[lower-greek 6] Cognitive Sensor[lower-greek 7]
I. – VI.

Each of these Six Common Consciousnesses –  referred to in Sanskrit as pravṛtti-vijñāna[lower-greek 8] – are posited on the basis of valid straightforward cognition,[lower-greek 9] on any individual practitioner's part, of sensory data input experienced solely by means of their bodily sense faculties.

The derivation of this particular dual classification schema for these first six, so-called "common" consciousnesses has its origins in the first four Nikāyas of the Sutta Pitaka – the second division of the Tipitaka in the Pali Canon – as first committed to writing during the Theravada school's fourth council at Sri Lanka in 83 (BCE).[13]

Both individually and collectively: these first six, so-called "common" consciousnesses are posited – in common – by all surviving buddhist tenet systems.
I.

Eye Consciousness

 cakṣur-vijñāna[2] ༡

Tibetan: མིག་གི་རྣམ་ཤེས་, Wylie: mig-gi rnam-shes

 眼識 Sight(s) Seeing Eyes
II.

Ear Consciousness

 śrotra-vijñāna[2] ༢

Tibetan: རྣའི་རྣམ་ཤེས་, Wylie: rna’i rnam-shes

 耳識 Sound(s) Hearing Ears
III.

Nose Consciousness

 ༣

Tibetan: སྣའི་རྣམ་ཤེས་, Wylie: sna’i rnam-shes

 鼻識 Smell(s) Smell Nose
IV.

Tongue Consciousness

 ༤

Tibetan: ལྕེའི་རྣམ་ཤེས་, Wylie: lce’i rnam-shes

 舌識 Taste(s) Taste Tongue
V.

Body Consciousness

 ༥

Tibetan: ལུས་ཀྱི་རྣམ་ཤེས་, Wylie: lus-kyi rnam-shes

 身識 Feeling(s) Touch Body
VI.

Mental Consciousness[lower-greek 10]

 mano-vijñāna[2] ༦

Tibetan: ཡིད་ཀྱི་རྣམ་ཤེས་, Wylie: yid-kyi rnam-shes

 意識 Thought(s) Ideation Mind
VII.

This Seventh Consciousness, posited on the basis of straightforward cognition in combination with inferential cognition,[lower-greek 11] is asserted, uncommonly, in Yogācāra.[2]

 VII.

Deluded awareness[lower-greek 12]

 Manas, kliṣṭa-manas[2] ༧

Tibetan: ཉོན་ཡིད་རྣམ་ཤེས་, Wylie: nyon-yid rnam-shes

 末那識 Self-grasping Disturbing emotion or attitude (Skt.: klesha)[lower-greek 13] Mind
VIII.

This Eighth Consciousness, posited on the basis of inferential cognition, is asserted, uncommonly, in Yogācāra.[2]

 VIII.

All-encompassing foundation consciousness[lower-greek 14]

 ālāya-vijñāna,[2] bīja-vijñāna ༨

Tibetan: ཀུན་གཞི་རྣམ་ཤེས་, Wylie: kun-gzhi rnam-shes

 藏識,

種子識, 阿賴耶識, or 本識

 Memory Reflexive awareness[lower-greek 15] Mind

Origins and development

Pali Canon

The first five sense-consciousnesses along with the sixth consciousness are identified in the Sutta Pitaka, especially the Salayatana Vagga subsection of the Samyutta Nikaya:

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

"Monks, I will teach you the All. Listen & pay close attention. I will speak."

"As you say, lord," the monks responded.

The Blessed One said, "What is the All? Simply the eye & forms, ear & sounds, nose & aromas, tongue & flavors, body & tactile sensations, intellect & ideas. This, monks, is called the All. [1] Anyone who would say, 'Repudiating this All, I will describe another,' if questioned on what exactly might be the grounds for his statement, would be unable to explain, and furthermore, would be put to grief. Why? Because it lies beyond range."[19]

Yogacara

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Main article: Yogacara

The Yogacara-school gives a detailed explanation of the workings of the mind and the way it constructs the reality we experience. It is "meant to be an explanation of experience, rather than a system of ontology".[20] Vasubandhu is considered to be the systematizer of Yogacara-thought.[21] Vasubandhu used the concept of the six consciousnesses, on which he elaborated in the Triṃśikaikā-kārikā (Treatise in Thirty Stanzas).[22]

Consciousness

According to the traditional interpretation, Vasubandhu states that there are eight consciousnesses:

  • Five sense-consciousnesses,
  • Mind (perception),
  • Manas (self-consciousness),[23]
  • Storehouse-consciousness.[24]

According to Kalupahana, this classification of eight consciousnesses is based on a misunderstanding of Vasubandhu's Triṃśikaikā-kārikā by later adherents.[25][note 1]

Ālayavijñāna

The ālaya-vijñāna (Japanese: 阿頼耶識 araya-shiki), or the "All-encompassing foundation consciousness",[4] forms the "base-consciousness" (mūla-vijñāna) or "causal consciousness". According to the traditional interpretation, the other seven consciousnesses are "evolving" or "transforming" consciousnesses originating in this base-consciousness.

The store-house consciousness accumulates all potential energy for the mental (mana) and physical (rupa) manifestation of one's existence (namarupa). It is the storehouse-consciousness which induces transmigration or rebirth, causing the origination of a new existence.

Rebirth and purification

The store-house consciousness receives impressions from all functions of the other consciousnesses, and retains them as potential energy, bija or "seeds", for their further manifestations and activities. Since it serves as the container for all experiential impressions it is also called the "seed consciousness" (種子識) or container consciousness.

According to Yogacara teachings, the seeds stored in the store consciousness of sentient beings are not pure.[note 2]

The store consciousness, while being originally immaculate in itself, contains a "mysterious mixture of purity and defilement, good and evil". Because of this mixture the transformation of consciousness from defilement to purity can take place and awakening is possible.[26]

Through the process of purification the dharma practitioner can become an Arhat, when the four defilements of the mental functions [note 3] of the manas-consciousness are purified.[note 4] [note 5]

Tathagata-garbha thought

According to the Lankavatara Sutra and the schools of Chan/Zen Buddhism, the alaya-vijnana is identical with the tathagata-garbha[note 6], and is fundamentally pure.[27][need quotation to verify]

The equation of alaya-vjnana and tathagatagarbha was contested. It was seen as "something akin to the Hindu notions of ātman (permanent, invariant self) and prakṛti (primordial substrative nature from which all mental, emotional and physical things evolve)." According to Lusthaus, the critique led by the end of the eighth century to the rise of the logico-epistemic tradition of of Yogācāra and a hybrid school combining Tathāgatagarbha thought with basic Yogācāra doctrines:[28]

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

The logico-epistemological wing in part sidestepped the critique by using the term citta-santāna, "mind-stream", instead of ālaya-vijñāna, for what amounted to roughly the same idea. It was easier to deny that a "stream" represented a reified self. On the other hand, the Tathāgatagarbha hybrid school was no stranger to the charge of smuggling notions of selfhood into its doctrines, since, for example, it explicitly defined the tathāgatagarbha as "permanent, pleasurable, self, and pure (nitya, sukha, ātman, śuddha)". Many Tathāgatagarbha texts, in fact, argue for the acceptance of selfhood (ātman) as a sign of higher accomplishment. The hybrid school attempted to conflate tathāgatagarbha with the ālaya-vijñāna.[28]

Transformations of consciousness

The traditional interpretation of the eight consciousnesses may be discarded on the ground of a reinterpretation of Vasubandhu's works. According to Kalupahana, instead of positing such an consciousnesses, the Triṃśikaikā-kārikā describes the transformations of this consciousness:

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

Taking vipaka, manana and vijnapti as three different kinds of functions, rather than characteristics, and understanding vijnana itself as a function (vijnanatiti vijnanam), Vasubandhu seems to be avoiding any form of substantialist thinking in relation to consciousness.[29]

These transformations are threefold:[29]

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

Whatever, indeed, is the variety of ideas of self and elements that prevails, it occurs in the transformation of consciousness. Such transformation is threefold, [namely,][30]

The first transformation results in the alaya:

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

the resultant, what is called mentation, as well as the concept of the object. Herein, the consciousness called alaya, with all its seeds, is the resultant.[31]

The alaya-vijnana therefore is not an eighth consciousness, but the resultant of the transformation of consciousness:

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

Instead of being a completely distinct category, alaya-vijnana merely represents the normal flow of the stream of consciousness uninterrupted by the appearance of reflective self-awareness. It is no more than the unbroken stream of consciousness called the life-process by the Buddha. It is the cognitive process, containing both emotive and co-native aspects of human experience, but without the enlarged egoistic emotions and dogmatic graspings characteristic of the next two transformations.[25]

The second transformation is manana, self-consciousness or "Self-view, self-confusion, self-esteem and self-love".[32] According to the Lankavatara and later interpreters it is the seventh consciousness.[33] It is "thinking" about the various perceptions occurring in the stream of consciousness".[33] The alaya is defiled by this self-interest;

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

[I]t can be purified by adopting a non-substantialist (anatman) perspective and thereby allowing the alaya-part (i.e. attachment) to dissipate, leaving consciousness or the function of being intact.[32]

The third transformation is visaya-vijnapti, the "concept of the object".[34] In this transformation the concept of objects is created. By creating these concepts human beings become "susceptible to grasping after the object":[34]

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

Vasubandhu is critical of the third transformation, not because it relates to the conception of an object, but because it generates grasping after a "real object" (sad artha), even when it is no more than a conception (vijnapti) that combines experience and reflection.[35]

A similar perspective is give by Walpola Rahula. According to Walpola Rahula, all the elements of the Yogācāra storehouse-consciousness are already found in the Pāli Canon.[36] He writes that the three layers of the mind (citta, manas, and vijñana) as presented by Asaṅga are also mentioned in the Pāli Canon:

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

Thus we can see that 'Vijñāna' represents the simple reaction or response of the sense organs when they come in contact with external objects. This is the uppermost or superficial aspect or layer of the 'Vijñāna-skandha'. 'Manas' represents the aspect of its mental functioning, thinking, reasoning, conceiving ideas, etc. 'Citta' which is here called 'Ālayavijñāna', represents the deepest, finest and subtlest aspect or layer of the Aggregate of consciousness. It contains all the traces or impressions of the past actions and all good and bad future possibilities.[37]

Understanding in Buddhist Tradition

China

Fa Hsiang and Hua Yen

Although Vasubandhu had postulated numerous ālaya-vijñāna-s, a separate one for each individual person in the para-kalpita,[note 2] this multiplicity was later eliminated in the Fa Hsiang and Hua Yen metaphysics.[note 7] These schools inculcated instead the doctrine of a single universal and eternal ālaya-vijñāna. This exalted enstatement of the ālaya-vijñāna is described in the Fa Hsiang as "primordial unity".[38]

The presentation of the three natures by Vasubandhu is consistent with the Neo-platonist views of Plotinus and his universal 'One', 'Mind', and 'Soul'.[39]

Chán

A core teaching of Chan/Zen Buddhism describes the transformation of the Eight Consciousnesses into the Four Wisdoms.[note 8] In this teaching, Buddhist practice is to turn the light of awareness around, from misconceptions regarding the nature of reality as being external, to kenshō, "directly see one's own nature".[citation needed]. Thus the Eighth Consciousness is transformed into the Great Perfect Mirror Wisdom, the Seventh Consciousness into the Equality (Universal Nature) Wisdom, the Sixth Consciousness into the Profound Observing Wisdom, and First to Fifth Consciousnesses into the All Performing (Perfection of Action) Wisdom.

Korea

The Interpenetration (通達) and Essence-Function (體用) of Wonhyo (元曉) is described in the Treatise on Awakening Mahāyāna Faith (AMF):

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

The author of the AMF was deeply concerned with the question of the respective origins of ignorance and enlightenment. If enlightenment is originally existent, how do we become submerged in ignorance? If ignorance is originally existent, how is it possible to overcome it? And finally, at the most basic level of mind, the alaya consciousness (藏識), is there originally purity or taint? The AMF dealt with these questions in a systematic and thorough fashion, working through the Yogacāra concept of the alaya consciousness. The technical term used in the AMF which functions as a metaphorical synonym for interpenetration is "permeation" or "perfumation (薫)," referring to the fact that defilement (煩惱) "perfumates" suchness (眞如), and suchness perfumates defilement, depending on the current condition of the mind.[42]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Kalupahana: "The above explanation of alaya-vijnana makes it very different from that found in the Lankavatara. The latter assumes alaya to be the eight consciousness, giving the impression that it represents a totally distinct category. Vasubandhu does not refer to it as the eight, even though his later disciples like Sthiramati and Hsuan Tsang constantly refer to it as such".[25]
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Each being has his own one and only, formless and no-place-to-abide store-house consciousness. Our "being" is created by our own store-consciousness, according to the karma seeds stored in it. In "coming and going" we definitely do not own the "no-coming and no-going" store-house consciousness, rather we are owned by it. Just as a human image shown in a monitor can never be described as lasting for any instant, since "he" is just the production of electron currents of data stored and flow from the hard disk of the computer, so do seed-currents drain from the store-consciousness, never last from one moment to the next.
  3. ↑ 心所法), self-delusion (我癡), self-view (我見), egotism (我慢), and self-love (我愛)
  4. ↑ By then the polluted mental functions of the first six consciousnesses would have been cleansed. The seventh or the manas-consciousness determines whether or not the seeds and the contentdrain from the alaya-vijnana breaks through, becoming a "function" to be perceived by us in the mental or physical world.
  5. ↑ In contrast to an Arhat, a Buddha is one with all his seeds stored in the eighth Seed consciousness. Cleansed and substituted, bad for good, one for one, his polluted-seeds-containing eighth consciousness (Alaya Consciousness) becomes an all-seeds-purified eighth consciousness (Pure consciousness 無垢識 ), and he becomes a Buddha.
  6. ↑ The womb or matrix of the Thus-come-one, the Buddha
  7. ↑ See also Buddha-nature#Popularisation in Chinese Buddhism
  8. ↑ It is found in Chapter 7 of the Platform Sutra of the Sixth Ancestor Zen Master Huineng and other Zen masters, such as Hakuin Ekaku, in his work titled Keiso Dokuqui,[40] and Xuyun, in his work titled Daily Lectures at Two Ch'an Weeks, Week 1, Fourth Day.[41]

Definitions

  1. ↑ Sanskrit nama = Tibetan: མིང་, Wylie: ming = English "name".[5]
  2. ↑ Sanskrit vijñāna = Tibetan: རྣམ་ཤེས་, Wylie: rnam-shes = English "consciousness".[6]
  3. ↑ Sanskrit anitya = Tibetan: མི་རྟག་པ་, Wylie: mi-rtag-pa = English "nonstatic phœnomenon".[7]
  4. ↑ Tibetan: འཁོར་ལོ་གསུམ་, Wylie: 'khor-lo gsum = English "three circles" of action.[8]
  5. ↑ Sanskrit rupa = Tibetan: གཟུགས་, Wylie: gzugs = English "form(s) of physical phœnomena".[9]
  6. ↑ Tibetan: ཤེས་པ་, Wylie: shes-pa = English "cognition".[10]
  7. ↑ Sanskrit indriya = Tibetan: དབང་པོ་, Wylie: dbang-po = English "cognitive sensor".[11]
  8. ↑ Sanskrit pravṛtti-vijñāna refers to the first six consciousnesses which derive from direct sensory (including mental) cognition.[2]:11
  9. ↑ Sanskrit pratyakshapramana = Tibetan: མངོན་སུམ་ཚད་མ་, Wylie: mngon-sum tshad-ma = English "valid straightforward cognition".[12]
  10. ↑ Sanskrit mano-vijñāna = Tibetan: ཡིད་ཀྱི་རྣམ་ཤེས་, Wylie: yid-kyi rnam-shes = English "mental consciousness".[14]
  11. ↑ Sanskrit anumana = Tibetan: རྗེས་དཔག་, Wylie: rjes-dpag = English "inferential cognition".[15]
  12. ↑ Tibetan: ཉོན་ཡིད་་, Wylie: nyon-yid = English "deluded awareness".[16]
  13. ↑ Sanskrit klesha = Tibetan: ཉོན་མོངས་, Wylie: nyon-mongs = English "disturbing emotion or attitude"[17] – also called "moving mind", or mind monkey, in some Chinese and Japanese schools.
  14. ↑ Sanskrit ālayavijñāna (from compounding ālaya – "abode" or dwelling", with vijñāna, or "consciousness") = Tibetan: ཀུན་གཞི་རྣམ་ཤེས་, Wylie: kun-gzhi rnam-shes = Chinese 阿賴耶識 = English "All-encompassing foundation consciousness"[4] = Japanese: arayashiki.
  15. ↑ Tibetan: རང་རིག་, Wylie: rang-rig = English "reflexive awareness"[18] in non-Gelug presentations of Sautrantika and Chittamatra tenet systems.

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. ↑ SN 35.23 Sabba Sutta: The All
  20. ↑ Kochumuttom 1999, p. 1.
  21. ↑ Kalupahana 1992, p. 126.
  22. ↑ Kalupahana 1992, p. 135-143.
  23. ↑ Kalupahana 1992, p. 138-140.
  24. ↑ Kalupahana 1992, p. 137-139.
  25. ↑ 25.0 25.1 25.2 Kalupahana 1992, p. 139.
  26. ↑ The Lankavatara Sutra, A Mahayana Text, Suzuki's introduction at p. xxvi, available online: [1].
  27. ↑ Peter Harvey, Consciousness Mysticism in the Discourses of the Buddha. In Karel Werner, ed., The Yogi and the Mystic. Curzon Press 1989, pages 96-97.
  28. ↑ 28.0 28.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  29. ↑ 29.0 29.1 Kalupahana 1992, p. 137.
  30. ↑ Kalupahana 1992, p. 192, Trimsika verse 1.
  31. ↑ Kalupahana 1992, p. 194, Trimsika verse 2.
  32. ↑ 32.0 32.1 Kalupahana 1992, p. 138.
  33. ↑ 33.0 33.1 Kalupahana 1992, p. 140.
  34. ↑ 34.0 34.1 Kalupahana 1992, p. 141.
  35. ↑ Kalupahana 1992, p. 141-142.
  36. ↑ Padmasiri De Silva, Robert Henry Thouless, Buddhist and Freudian Psychology. Third revised edition published by NUS Press, 1992 page 66.
  37. ↑ Walpola Rahula, quoted in Padmasiri De Silva, Robert Henry Thouless, Buddhist and Freudian Psychology. Third revised edition published by NUS Press, 1992 page 66, [2].
  38. ↑ Fa Hsiang: Primal Unity
  39. ↑ Neo=platonism
  40. ↑ http://terebess.hu/zen/hakuin1.html#1
  41. ↑ http://hsuyun.budismo.net/en/dharma/chan_sessions3.html
  42. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Sources

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Norbu, Namkhai (2001). The Precious Vase: Instructions on the Base of Santi Maha Sangha. Shang Shung Edizioni. Second revised edition. (Translated from the Tibetan, edited and annotated by Adriano Clemente with the help of the author. Translated from Italian into English by Andy Lukianowicz.)
  • Epstein, Ronald (undated). Verses Delineating the Eight Consciousnesses . A translation and explanation of the "Verses Delineating the Eight Consciousnesses by Tripitaka Master Hsuan-Tsang of the Tang Dynasty.

Further reading

  • Schmithausen, Lambert (1987). Ālayavijñāna. On the Origin and Early Development of a Central Concept of Yogācāra Philosophy. 2 vols. Studia Philologica Buddhica, Monograph Series, 4a and 4b, Tokyo.
  • Waldron, William, S. (2003). The Buddhist Unconscious: The Ālaya-vijñāna in the Context of Indian Buddhist Thought, London, RoutledgeCurzon.

External links

Retrieved from "https://infogalactic.com/w/index.php?title=Eight_Consciousnesses&oldid=193029"