Short Shirl

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Shirl
300px
N111, the second Shirl, drops a torpedo at Dunbar, UK in July 1918
Role shipborne torpedo-bomber
National origin United Kingdom
Manufacturer Short Brothers
First flight 27 May 1918
Number built 4

The Short N.1B Shirl was a British single seat biplane intended to carry heavy torpedoes from early aircraft carriers late in World War I. It met its specifications but planned production was ended with the Armistice of 1918. The design was developed further for an attempt to cross the Atlantic non-stop for the first time, but this was not successful.

Development

The first ship-borne torpedo bomber, the Sopwith Cuckoo had been well received but was unable to carry the Royal Navy's 1,423 lb (645 kg)[1] Mark VIII torpedo that was required to destroy the largest warships. The Admiralty issued a Specification (N.1B) in late 1917 for an aircraft that could carry this torpedo, and Short Brothers and Blackburn submitted proposals, Short's with the Shirl and Blackburn with the Blackburd. Both manufacturers were asked to provide three prototypes using the 385 hp (290 kW) Rolls-Royce Eagle VIII water-cooled engine.[2]

The Shirl was a two bay biplane with foldable fabric covered wings without stagger and of equal span carrying two pairs of ailerons. The fuselage was rectangular in cross-section and plywood covered in anticipation of ditching at the end of the mission, since deck landing was not yet practicable. The split axle undercarriage could be jettisoned for the same situation. The engine was cooled with a honeycomb radiator immediately behind a two-blade propeller.[2]

Operational history

After initial tests the first Shirl was given slight sweepback to allow for a shift in the centre of gravity caused by the addition of flotation bags. The undercarriage was also modified: the early single axle version was jettisoned after take-off to allow for torpedo release and ditching, but now, with a split axle, the torpedo or the undercarriage could be released separately or not at all. The new undercarriage had a pair of skids, each with a pair of wheels. With this arrangement the first aircraft satisfactorily underwent ditching trials in July 1918. This aircraft briefly used a four-bladed propeller, but soon reverted to the original two-bladed airscrew.[2]

File:Short Shirl at Grain.jpg
The Short Shirl N111 at the Isle of Grain in July 1918

The second Shirl had larger ailerons and no tailplane incidence adjustment, which made it hard to trim for flight both with and without the torpedo. The third and final aircraft, delivered in December 1918 regained tailplane adjustment and had a further revised undercarriage.[2]

Trials showed the aircraft could deliver the torpedo, though it lacked the Cuckoo's evasive agility after the burden of the torpedo was relieved. An order for 100 was placed, and quotations for more invited; but in early 1919 the Navy decided not to go ahead, ordering more Cuckoos instead.[2]

The Shirl was regarded as a stable (in civilian life a virtue) aircraft with good fuel economy and weightlifting abilities. Mail-carrying was seen as a possible way of exploiting these characteristics, and the third Shirl was fitted with a large plywood container in the torpedo bay. A number of trial flights were made but no commercial service followed.[2]

Variants

Because of its weightlifting ability and fuel economy, the Shirl was considered as the basis of a long range aircraft to vie for the Daily Mail £10,000 prize[3] for the first heavier-than-air transatlantic flight. For this attempt Short Brothers built a heavily revised Shirl, nicknamed the Shamrock. It had its span increased by 10 ft 2 in (3.1 m) to 62 ft 2 in (18.95 m)[4] with a three-bay wing giving a wing area of 1,015 ft² (94.3 m²). Empty weight increased by 662 lb (300 kg) to 3,962 lb (1,798 kg). A second seat set staggered side by side for the navigator was provided. A very large tubular fuel tank attached to the torpedo-rack increased the total fuel load to 435 Imp gal (1,980 l) which would have given a 3,200 mi (5,120 km) still air range (or 40 hours at 80 mph (128 km/h).[5] Very surprisingly, an East-West flight was chosen, very much against the prevailing winds and something not achieved until the flight of the Junkers W.33 Bremen in April 1928. The Curragh plain in Ireland was chosen as the departure point, but the Shamrock never got that far, ditching in the Irish Sea due to engine failure on the way to Ireland on 18 April 1919. The aircraft was recovered and might have made another attempt, but in July 1919 Alcock and Brown won the prize in the Vickers Vimy, flying West to East.[2]

Specifications (standard Shirl)

Data from Barnes 1989, p. 150

General characteristics

  • Crew: 1
  • Length: 35 ft 0 in (10.67 m)
  • Wingspan: 52 ft 0 in (15.85 m)
  • Height: 13 ft 3 in (4.04 m) [6] 4.04
  • Wing area: 791 sq ft (73.5 m2)
  • Empty weight: 3,300 lb (1,497 kg)
  • Gross weight: 5,950 lb (2,699 kg)
  • Powerplant: 1 × Rolls-Royce Eagle VIII V-12 cylinder water-cooled engine, 385 hp (287 kW)

Performance

  • Maximum speed: 92 mph (148 km/h; 80 kn)
  • Endurance: 6.5 hours
  • Service ceiling: 10,007 ft (3,050 m) [6]

Armament

The name

Shirl is not a common English word. The Oxford English Dictionary gives four meanings. Two of these, "shrill" and "rough", re hair are very old and seem to have fallen out of use in Elizabethan times. Two usages remained extant at the beginning of the 20th century: "a trimming" (of hair, wool etc.) and a "slide on ice". Both are given as dialect, though the first was not always so. The second is a northern usage. Either might perhaps describe a torpedo attack; the Short family was from the north of England.[7]

See also

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration and era

References

Notes

  1. Barnes 1989, p. 144
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Barnes 1989, p. 144–150
  3. Flight 5 April 1913
  4. Flight 10 April 1919
  5. Barnes 1989, p. 150
  6. 6.0 6.1 Bruce 1957, pp. 508–9
  7. Barnes 1989, p. 1

Bibliography

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links

Media related to Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. at Wikimedia Commons