United States House of Representatives elections, 1790
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
All 67[Note 2] seats to the United States House of Representatives 34 seats were needed for a majority |
||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Results:
Federalist majority
Anti-Federalist majority
Even split
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Elections to the House of Representatives for the 2nd Congress took place in 1790 and 1791, in the middle of President George Washington's first term. While formal political parties still did not exist, coalitions of pro-Washington (pro-Administration) representatives and anti-Administration representatives each gained two seats as a result of the addition of new states to the union. Speaker Frederick Muhlenberg, who had led the Pro-Administrationists in 1789, switched loyalties to the Anti-Administrationists during the tenure of the 1st Congress. He failed to win election to the Speakership as their leader as a result of these elections, and was succeeded by Jonathan Trumbull, Jr., who became the 2nd Speaker of the House.
Contents
Election summaries
In this period, each state fixed its own date for congressional general elections, as early as April 27, 1790 (in New York) and as late as October 11, 1791 (in Pennsylvania). Elections to a Congress took place both in the even-numbered year before and in the odd-numbered year when the Congress convened. In some states, the congressional delegation was not elected until after the legal start of the Congress (on the 4th day of March in the odd-numbered year). The first session of this Congress was convened in Philadelphia on October 24, 1791.
Kentucky and Vermont became states during the 2nd Congress, adding two seats each.[1] The legislation admitted Vermont was passed at the end of the 1st Congress taking effect on March 4, 1791, the first day of the 2nd Congress, so that Vermont was represented from the start of the Congress, while Kentucky was unrepresented until the 2nd session.
State | Type | Date | Total seats |
Pro- Administration |
Anti- Administration |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Seats | Change | Seats | Change | ||||
Connecticut | At-large | September 20, 1790 | 5 | 5 | 0 | ||
Delaware | At-large | November 8, 1790 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
Maryland | At-large/District[Note 4] (6) | October 4, 1790 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
Massachusetts | District (8) | October 4, 1790[Note 5] | 8 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
New Hampshire | At-large | August 30, 1790 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
New York | District (6) | April 27–29, 1790 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
Rhode Island | At-large | October 19, 1790 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
South Carolina | District (5) | October 12, 1790 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
Virginia | District (10) | September 1, 1790 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
1791 elections | |||||||
Georgia | District[Note 6] (3) | January 3, 1791 | 3 | 0 | 3 | ||
New Jersey | At-large | January 26, 1791 | 4 | 4 | 0 | ||
North Carolina | District (5) | January 28, 1791 | 5 | 2 | 3 | ||
Pennsylvania | District[Note 7] (8) | October 11, 1791 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
Vermont | District (2) | July 13, 1791[Note 8] | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
1792 elections | |||||||
Kentucky | District (2) | September 7, 1792 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Total | 69[Note 3] | 39 56.5% |
2 | 30[Note 3] 43.5% |
2 |
House composition
End of the last Congress
A | A | ||||||||
A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
A | A | A | A | A | A | V | P | P | P |
Majority→ | P | ||||||||
P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P |
P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P |
P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P |
P | P |
Beginning of the next Congress
A | A | A | A | ||||||
A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
A | A | A | A | A | V | P | P | P | P |
Majority→ | P | ||||||||
P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P |
P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P |
P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P |
P | P | P | P |
Key: |
|
---|
Late elections to the 1st Congress
<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>
North Carolina and Rhode Island ratified the Constitution on November 21, 1789, and May 29, 1790, respectively. Neither state elected congressional representatives until after their admission to the union.
North Carolina
District | Result | Candidates |
---|---|---|
North Carolina 1 Also known as Roanoke division |
Anti-Administration win | John B. Ashe (A) 48.9% Nathaniel Macon (A) 41.5% Stephen Moore 8.9% Parsons[Note 9] 0.7% |
North Carolina 2 Also known as Edenton and New Bern division |
Anti-Administration win | Hugh Williamson (A) 73.9% Stephen Cabarrus 26.0% |
North Carolina 3 Also known as Cape Fear division |
Anti-Administration win | Timothy Bloodworth (A) 98.4% Benjamin Smith 1.6% |
North Carolina 4 Also known as Yadkin division |
Pro-Administration win | John Steele (P)[Note 10] Joseph MacDowell Waightstill Avery |
North Carolina 5 Also known as Western division |
Pro-Administration win | John Sevier (P)[Note 10] |
The 5th district (or Western Division) covered areas beyond the Appalachian Mountains that were ceded to the federal government in May 1790 to form the Southwest Territory (later the State of Tennessee) during the 1st Congress. John Sevier, who held the seat for the 5th district, was permitted to retain his seat for the remainder of the 1st Congress in spite of the fact that the territory he represented was no longer part of a state. North Carolina would subsequently re-district to choose representatives for the 2nd Congress.
Rhode Island
District | Result | Candidates[Note 11] |
---|---|---|
Rhode Island At-Large | Pro-Administration win | Benjamin Bourne (P) 72.7% Job Comstock 23.2% James Sheldon 3.4% |
Complete returns
Kentucky was admitted during the 2nd Congress and elected its first representatives in 1792
Connecticut
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Connecticut At-Large 5 seats on a general ticket |
Benjamin Huntington | Pro-Administration | 1788 | Lost re-election Pro-Administration hold |
Roger Sherman (P) 14.9% Pierpont Edwards 11.3% James Hillhouse 10.2% Jonathan Sturges (P) 8.7% Jonathan Trumbull, Jr. (P) 8.7% Tapping Reeve 8.4% Jeremiah Wadsworth[Note 12] (P) 8.3% Amasa Learned[Note 12] (P) 7.4% Stephen M. Mitchell (P) 7.2% Benjamin Huntington 6.9% John Chester 4.1% James Davenport (P) 4.0% |
Roger Sherman | Pro-Administration | 1788 | Re-elected | ||
Jonathan Sturges | Pro-Administration | 1788 | Re-elected | ||
Jonathan Trumbull, Jr. | Pro-Administration | 1788 | Re-elected | ||
Jeremiah Wadsworth | Pro-Administration | 1788 | Lost re-election Pro-Administration hold |
There were two subsequent special elections. The first was held to fill the vacancy left by Pierpont Edwards (P) declining to serve and was won by Jeremiah Wadsworth (P). The second was held to fill the vacancy left by Roger Sherman (P)'s election to the Senate and was won by Amasa Learned (P).
Delaware
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates[Note 11] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Delaware At-Large | John M. Vining | Pro-Administration | 1789 | Re-elected | John M. Vining (P) 50.3% Joshua Clayton (P) 28.9% Thomas Duff 20.8% |
Georgia
Georgia switched to a conventional district system for the Second Congress. At the time, the districts were not numbered, but are retroactively renumbered as the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd respectively here.
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Georgia 1 Called the Southern (or Eastern) District |
James Jackson | Anti-Administration | 1789 | Lost re-election Anti-Administration hold |
Anthony Wayne (A) 50.4% James Jackson (A) 49.5% Others 0.2% |
Georgia 2 Called the Middle District |
Abraham Baldwin | Anti-Administration | 1789 | Re-elected | Abraham Baldwin (A) 56.2% Thomas P. Carnes (A) James Jackson (A) 1.2% John Jones 0.3% |
Georgia 3 Called the Northern (or Western) District |
George Mathews | Anti-Administration | 1789 | Lost re-election Anti-Administration hold |
Francis Willis (A) 66.5% George Mathews (A) 33.5% |
Anthony Wayne's election to the 1st district was subsequently challenged, and after investigation, the House determined that electoral fraud had occurred. Anthony's seat was declared void and a special election was held for his successor which was won by John Milledge (A)
Maryland
Under Maryland law for the election for the 1st and 2nd Congresses "candidates were elected at-large but had to be residents of a specific district with the statewide vote determining winners from each district."
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maryland 1 | Michael J. Stone | Anti-Administration | 1789 | Lost re-election Pro-Administration gain |
Philip Key (P) 56.8% Michael J. Stone (A) 43.2% |
Maryland 2 | Joshua Seney | Anti-Administration | 1789 | Re-elected | Joshua Seney (A) 57.1% James Tilghman 42.9% |
Maryland 3 | Benjamin Contee | Anti-Administration | 1789 | Lost re-election Pro-Administration gain |
William Pinkney (P) 61.6% Benjamin Contee (A) 38.4% |
Maryland 4 | William Smith | Anti-Administration | 1789 | Retired Anti-Administration hold |
Samuel Sterett (A) 100% |
Maryland 5 | George Gale | Pro-Administration | 1789 | Lost re-election Pro-Administration hold |
William V. Murray (P) 56.4% George Gale (P) 43.6% |
Maryland 6 | Daniel Carroll | Pro-Administration | 1789 | Lost re-election Anti-Administration gain |
Upton Sheredine (A) 55.5% Daniel Carroll (P) 44.5% |
Joshua Seney (A) of the 2nd district resigned December 6, 1792 to accept a judicial position and was replaced in a special election by William Hindman (P)
William Pinkney (P) of the 3rd district resigned due to questions of ineligibility due to his residence[2] and was replaced in a special election by John Francis Mercer (A).
Massachusetts
<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Massachusetts' law at the time required a majority for election. This condition was met in four of the eight districts, the remaining four required between 2 and 8 ballots for election. Only the first and last are listed in this section to conserve space. Information on the intermediate ballots are available at United States House of Representatives elections in Massachusetts, 1790.
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First ballot | Final ballot[Note 13] | |||||
Massachusetts 1 | Fisher Ames | Pro-Administration | 1788 | Re-elected | Fisher Ames (P) 75.1% Benjamin Austin 16.1% Thomas Dawes 8.8% |
|
Massachusetts 2 | Benjamin Goodhue | Pro-Administration | 1788 | Re-elected | Benjamin Goodhue (P) 88.8% Samuel Holten 11.2% |
|
Massachusetts 3 | Elbridge Gerry | Anti-Administration | 1788 | Re-elected | Elbridge Gerry (A) 60.4% Nathaniel Gorham 39.6% |
|
Massachusetts 4 | Theodore Sedgwick | Pro-Administration | 1788 | Re-elected | Theodore Sedgwick (P) 75.0% Samuel Lyman (P) 16.3% Scattering 8.7% |
|
Massachusetts 5 | Previous incumbent George Partridge (P) resigned August 14, 1790 | Pro-Administration hold | Shearjashub Bourne (P) 41.8% Thomas Davis 37.3% Joshua Thomas 20.9% |
Shearjashub Bourne (P) 65.3% Joshua Thomas 27.2% Thomas Davis 7.5% |
||
Massachusetts 6 | George Leonard Redistricted from the 7th district |
Pro-Administration | 1788 | Re-elected | Walter Spooner 25.5% Phanuel Bishop (A) 22.6% George Leonard (P) 22.3% Peleg Coffin, Jr. (P) 16.7% David Cobb 12.9% |
George Leonard (P) 55.6% Phanuel Bishop (A) 27.7% Peleg Coffin, Jr. (P) 16.7% |
Massachusetts 7 | Jonathan Grout Redistricted from the 8th district |
Anti-Administration | 1788 | Lost re-election Pro-Administration gain |
Jonathan Grout (A) 39.1% Artemas Ward (P) 39.0% John Sprague 14.5% Nathan Tyloer 7.4% |
Artemas Ward (P) 56.6% Jonathan Grout (A) 43.4% |
Massachusetts 8 | George Thatcher Redistricted from the 6th district |
Pro-Administration | 1788 | Re-elected | George Thatcher (P) 37.2% William Lithgow 22.3% Nathaniel Wells 16.1% Josiah Thatcher 9.2% William Martin 4.9% Arthur Noble 3.6% Daniel Davis 1.8% Peleg Wadsworth (P) 1.5% |
George Thatcher (P) 52.3% William Lithgow 41.1% Nathaniel Wells 6.6% |
New Hampshire
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
New Hampshire at-large 3 seats on a general ticket |
Abiel Foster | Pro-Administration | 1789 (special) | Lost re-election Pro-Administration hold |
Samuel Livermore (P[Note 14]) 25.1% Jeremiah Smith (P) 13.1% Nicholas Gilman (P) 11.8% John Samuel Sherburne (A) 11.1% Abiel Foster (P) 8.5% James Sheafe (P?) 7.8% Nathaniel Peabody 7.0% Others 15.5% |
Samuel Livermore | Anti-Administration | 1788 | Re-elected as Pro-Administration |
||
Nicholas Gilman | Pro-Administration | 1788 | Re-elected |
New Jersey
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates[Note 11] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
New Jersey At-large 4 seats on a general ticket |
Elias Boudinot | Pro-Administration | 1789 | Re-elected | Abraham Clark (P) 19.9% Jonathan Dayton (P) 13.8% Elias Boudinot (P) 13.7% Aaron Kitchell (P) 8.8% Lambert Cadwalader (P) 7.0% James Linn 5.5% Thomas Sinnickson (P) 5.1% Robert Hoops 4.9% Thomas Henderson 3.7% John Witherspoon 2.7% John Beatty (P) 2.3% John Sheppard 1.9% Joseph Ellis 1.7% Robert Ogden 1.5% James Schureman (P) 1.5% John Harring 1.1% John Hugg 1.1% |
Lambert Cadwalader | Pro-Administration | 1789 | Lost re-election Pro-Administration hold |
||
James Schureman | Pro-Administration | 1789 | Lost re-election Pro-Administration hold |
||
Thomas Sinnickson | Pro-Administration | 1789 | Lost re-election Pro-Administration hold |
New York
<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>
New York's districts were not numbered at the time, numbering below is retroactive.
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
New York 1 | William Floyd | Anti-Administration | 1789 | Lost re-election Pro-Administration gain |
James Townsend (P) 35.5% John Vanderbilt (P) 19.6% William Floyd (A) 19.1% Thomas Tredwell[Note 12] (A) 17.0% Ezra L'Hommedieu (A) 8.8% |
New York 2 | John Laurance | Pro-Administration | 1789 | Re-elected | John Laurance (P) 98.4% Melancton Smith (A) 1.6% |
New York 3 | Egbert Benson | Pro-Administration | 1789 | Re-elected | Egbert Benson (P) 60.8% Theodorus Bailey (A) 39.2% |
New York 4 | John Hathorn | Anti-Administration | 1789 | Lost re-election Anti-Administration hold |
Cornelius C. Schoonmaker (A) 52.1% Peter Van Gaasbeck (P) 43.7% John Hathorn (A) 3.5% Christopher Tappen (A) 0.8% |
New York 5 | Peter Silvester | Pro-Administration | 1789 | Re-elected | Peter Silvester (P) 58.4% John Livingston (A) 41.6% |
New York 6 | Jeremiah Van Rensselaer | Anti-Administration | 1789 | Lost re-election Pro-Administration gain |
James Gordon (P) 59.0% Jeremiah Van Rensselaer (A) 41.0% |
A vacancy occurred in the 1st district when Representative-election James Townsend (P) died on May 24, 1790, prior to the start of the 2nd Congress. A special election was held to fill the resulting vacancy, which was won by Thomas Tredwell (A)
North Carolina
Due to the cession of North Carolina's trans-Appalachian territory to form the Southwest Territory, the territory of the old 5th district was lost. North Carolina retained the same number of Representatives, and so it redistricted for the Second Congress.
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Carolina 1 Also called Yadkin Division |
John Steele Redistricted from the 4th district |
Pro-Administration | 1790 | Re-elected | John Steele (P) 87.3% Joseph MacDowell (A) 12.7% |
North Carolina 2 Also called Centre Division |
None (District created) | New seat Anti-Administration gain |
Nathaniel Macon (A)[Note 10] Alexander Mebane (A) |
||
North Carolina 3 | John Baptista Ashe Redistricted from the 1st district |
Anti-Administration | 1790 | Re-elected | Jonathan B. Ashe (A)[Note 10] |
North Carolina 4 Also called Albemarle Division |
Hugh Williamson Redistricted from the 2nd district |
Anti-Administration | 1790 | Re-elected | Hugh Williamson (A)[Note 15] Charles Johnson (A) |
North Carolina 5 Also called Cape Fear Division |
Timothy Bloodworth Redistricted from the 3rd district |
Anti-Administration | 1790 | Lost re-election Pro-Administration gain |
William B. Grove (P) 65.2% Timothy Bloodworth (A) 34.6% Benjamin Smith (P) 0.2% |
Pennsylvania
<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Pennsylvania had elected its Representatives at-large in the 1st Congress, but switched to using districts in the 2nd Congress. Five incumbents ran for re-election, four of whom won, while three others retired leaving three open seats. Two districts had no incumbents residing in them, while one (the 8th) had a single representative who declined to run for re-election and one (the 2nd) had three incumbents, only one of whom ran for re-election.
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates[3] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pennsylvania 1 | Thomas Fitzsimons redistricted from the at-large district |
Pro-Administration | 1788 | Re-elected | Thomas Fitzsimons (P) 85.1% Charles Thompson (A) 14.9% |
Pennsylvania 2 | Frederick Muhlenberg redistricted from the at-large district |
Pro-Administration | 1788 | Re-elected as Anti-Administration |
Frederick Muhlenberg (A[Note 16])[Note 10] Amos Greg (A) "Dr." Jones |
George Clymer redistricted from the at-large district |
Pro-Administration | 1788 | Retired Anti-Administration gain |
||
Henry Wynkoop redistricted from the at-large district |
Pro-Administration | 1788 | Retired Anti-Administration gain |
||
Pennsylvania 3 | John Peter Muhlenberg redistricted from the at-large district |
Anti-Administration | 1788 | Lost re-election Pro-Administration gain |
Israel Jacobs (P) 61.2% John Peter Muhlenberg (A) 38.8% |
Pennsylvania 4 | Daniel Hiester redistricted from the at-large district |
Anti-Administration | 1788 | Re-elected | Daniel Hiester (A)[Note 10] |
Pennsylvania 5 | None (District created) | Pro-Administration gain | John W. Kittera (P)[Note 10] | ||
Pennsylvania 6 | None (District created) | Anti-Administration gain | Andrew Gregg (A) 51.2% John Allison (P) 18.3% James McLean (A) 10.9% Thomas Johnston (P) 10.3% William Montgomery (A) 9.3% |
||
Pennsylvania 7 | Thomas Hartley redistricted from the at-large district |
Pro-Administration | 1788 | Re-elected | Thomas Hartley (P) 71.1% William Irvine (A) 28.9% |
Pennsylvania 8 | Thomas Scott redistricted from the at-large district |
Pro-Administration | 1788 | Retired Anti-Administration gain |
William Findley (A) 65.2% John Woods (P) 34.8% |
Rhode Island
Rhode Island held elections for the Second Congress on October 18, 1790, about a month and a half after elections for the First Congress due to the late ratification of the Constitution
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rhode Island At-Large | Benjamin Bourne | Pro-Administration | 1790 | Re-elected | Benjamin Bourne (P) 56.6% Paul Mumford 33.0% James Sheldon 10.1% |
South Carolina
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
South Carolina 1 Also known as the Charleston Division |
William L. Smith | Pro-Administration | 1788 | Re-elected | William L. Smith (P)[Note 10] |
South Carolina 2 Also known as the Beaufort Division |
Aedanus Burke | Anti-Administration | 1788 | Retired? Pro-Administration gain |
Robert Barnwell (P)[Note 10] |
South Carolina 3 Also known as the Georgetown Division |
Daniel Huger | Pro-Administration | 1788 | Re-elected | Daniel Huger (P)[Note 10] |
South Carolina 4 Also known as the Camden Division |
Thomas Sumter | Anti-Administration | 1788 | Re-elected | Thomas Sumter (A)[Note 10] |
South Carolina 5 Also known as the Ninety-Six Division |
Thomas Tudor Tucker | Anti-Administration | 1788 | Re-elected | Thomas Tudor Tucker (A)[Note 10] |
Vermont
Vermont was admitted at the end of the First Congress, with the admission taking effect at the start of the Second Congress. Vermont was entitled to elect two representatives. Vermont law at the time required a majority to win an office. In the 1st district, no candidate won a majority, necessitating a run-off.
District | Result | Candidates[Note 11] | |
---|---|---|---|
First ballot | Second ballot | ||
Vermont 1 Called the Western Division |
Anti-Administration win | Matthew Lyon (A?) 28.7% Israel Smith (A) 24.6% Isaac Tichenor (P) 22.7% Samuel Hitchcock 18.1% Ira Allen 2.3% Ebenezer Marvin 1.6% Gideon Olin 1.3% Others 0.7% |
Israel Smith (A) 68.4% Matthew Lyon (A?) 29.4% Isaac Tichenor 2.2% |
Vermont 2 Called the Eastern Division |
Anti-Administration win | Nathaniel Niles (A)[Note 10] Stephen Jacob Daniel Buck (P) |
Virginia
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Virginia 1 | Alexander White | Pro-Administration | 1789 | Re-elected | Alexander White (P) 93.3% J.P. Duvall 6.7% |
Virginia 2 | John Brown | Anti-Administration | 1789 | Re-elected | John Brown (A)[Note 10] James M. Marshall |
Virginia 3 | Andrew Moore | Anti-Administration | 1789 | Re-elected | Andrew Moore (A)[Note 10] |
Virginia 4 | Richard Bland Lee | Pro-Administration | 1789 | Re-elected | Richard Bland Lee (P) 62.1% Arthur Lee 37.9% |
Virginia 5 | James Madison, Jr. | Anti-Administration | 1789 | Re-elected | James Madison, Jr. (A) 97.8% James Monroe (A) 2.2% |
Virginia 6 | Isaac Coles | Anti-Administration | 1789 | Retired Anti-Administration hold |
Abraham B. Venable (A)[Note 10] Charles Lintch Charles Clay |
Virginia 7 | John Page | Anti-Administration | 1789 | Re-elected | John Page (A)[Note 10] Meriwether Smith Francis Corbin Henry Lee |
Virginia 8 | Josiah Parker | Anti-Administration | 1789 | Re-elected | Josiah Parker (A) 76.1% Isaac Avery 23.9% |
Virginia 9 | William B. Giles | Anti-Administration | 1790 (special) | Re-elected | William B. Giles (A) 59.3% Thomas Edmonds 40.6% John Mason 0.1% |
Virginia 10 | Samuel Griffin | Pro-Administration | 1789 | Re-elected as Anti-Administration |
Samuel Griffin (A[Note 17])[Note 10] |
John Brown of the 2nd district resigned June 1, 1792 after being elected as Senator for the new state of Kentucky. The territory he represented covered the area that had been admitted as Kentucky (which was entitled to two seats), and therefore his seat was left vacant.
See also
- List of United States House of Representatives elections, 1789–1822
- United States Senate elections, 1790
- 1st United States Congress
- 2nd United States Congress
Notes
- ↑ Excluding states that joined during the Second Congress
- ↑ 2 more seats were added by the admission of new States after the start of this Congress
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Includes late elections
- ↑ Maryland had six representatives elected by the whole state electorate, who had to choose one candidate from each district.
- ↑ Massachusetts electoral law required a majority for election, a total of additional trials were required in 4 districts, held between November 26, 1790 and April 2, 1792
- ↑ Changed from combined at-large/district method
- ↑ Changed from at-large method
- ↑ A majority was required for election, which was not met in one of the districts necessitating a second election on September 6, 1791
- ↑ Source does not give first name
- ↑ 10.00 10.01 10.02 10.03 10.04 10.05 10.06 10.07 10.08 10.09 10.10 10.11 10.12 10.13 10.14 10.15 10.16 10.17 Source does not give numbers of votes or has incomplete data
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 Only candidates with at least 1% of the vote listed
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 Won subsequent special election
- ↑ The 5th and 7th districts required 2 ballots, the 8th district required 4, and the 6th district required 8 ballots
- ↑ Anti-Administration in the 1st Congress, Livermore was Pro-Administration in the 2nd Congress
- ↑ Won by a margin of 896 votes
- ↑ Changed from Pro-Administration to Anti-Administration between the 1st and 2nd Congresses
- ↑ Had been Pro-Administration previous election, and would switch back to Pro-Administration in the next election
References
Bibliography
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
External links
- Office of the Historian (Office of Art & Archives, Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives)