<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>
United States Senate election in Colorado, 2014
|
← 2008 |
November 4, 2014 |
2020 → |
|
|
300px
County results
|
|
Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. The 2014 United States Senate election in Colorado was held on November 4, 2014 to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent the State of Colorado, concurrently with the election of the Governor of Colorado, other elections to the United States Senate, elections to the United States House of Representatives, and various state and local elections.
Incumbent Democratic Senator Mark Udall ran for re-election to a second term, but was defeated by Republican U.S. Representative Cory Gardner by fewer than 40,000 votes out of over 2 million cast.
Democratic primary
Mark Udall was the only Democrat to file to run, and thus at the Democratic state assembly on April 12, 2014, he was renominated unopposed.[1]
Candidates
Nominated
Results
Democratic primary results[3] |
Party |
Candidate |
Votes |
% |
|
Democratic |
Mark Udall (Incumbent) |
213,746 |
100 |
Total votes |
213,746 |
100 |
Republican primary
At the Republican state assembly on April 12, 2014, Cory Gardner received 73% of the votes of over 3,900 delegates. Neither Randy Baumgardner nor Tom Janich received the required 30% make the ballot and thus Gardner received the party's nomination.[4]
Candidates
Nominated
Rejected
Withdrew
Declined
- Bob Beauprez, former U.S. Representative and nominee for Governor in 2006 (running for Governor)[20][21][22][23]
- Mike Coffman, U.S. Representative[22]
- Dan Domenico, Solicitor General of Colorado[24]
- Doug Lamborn, U.S. Representative[25][26]
- Jane E. Norton, former Lieutenant Governor of Colorado and candidate for the U.S. Senate in 2010[27][28]
- Scott Renfroe, State Senator[29][30]
- Victor E. Renuart, Jr., former commander of United States Northern Command and the North American Aerospace Defense Command[24]
- Ellen Roberts, State Senator[31][32]
- John Suthers, Attorney General of Colorado[5]
- Scott Tipton, U.S. Representative[31][33]
Endorsements
Polling
Poll source |
Date(s)
administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Mark
Aspiri |
Randy
Baumgardner |
Cory
Gardner |
Owen
Hill |
Tom
Janich |
Floyd
Trujillo |
Other |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
March 13–16, 2014 |
255 |
± 6.1% |
3% |
15% |
44% |
6% |
4% |
0% |
— |
29% |
Hypothetical polling
|
Poll source |
Date(s)
administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Mark
Aspiri |
Randy
Baumgardner |
Ken
Buck |
Owen
Hill |
Jaime
McMillan |
Amy
Stephens |
Other |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
December 3–4, 2013 |
335 |
± 5.2% |
0% |
8% |
45% |
2% |
1% |
7% |
— |
37% |
|
Results
Republican primary results[3] |
Party |
Candidate |
Votes |
% |
|
Republican |
Cory Gardner |
338,324 |
100 |
Total votes |
338,324 |
100 |
Libertarian Party
Candidates
Nominated
Unity Party of America
Candidates
Nominated
Independents
Candidates
Declared
- Raúl Acosta, IT professional[38]
- Steve Shogan, neurosurgeon[39]
General election
Fundraising
Candidate |
Raised |
Spent |
Cash on Hand |
Mark Udall (D) |
$14,088,510 |
$15,746,249 |
$536,332 |
Cory Gardner (R) |
$9,680,263 |
$9,100,730 |
$1,875,029 |
Polling
Poll source |
Date(s)
administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Mark
Udall (D) |
Cory
Gardner (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
November 1–2, 2014 |
739 |
± 3.6% |
45% |
48% |
5%[40] |
3% |
47% |
50% |
— |
3% |
Quinnipiac University |
October 28–November 2, 2014 |
815 |
± 3.4% |
43% |
45% |
7%[41] |
4% |
45% |
46% |
2% |
6% |
YouGov |
October 25–31, 2014 |
1,417 |
± 3.3% |
42% |
43% |
5% |
11% |
Public Policy Polling |
October 28–29, 2014 |
573 |
± ? |
48% |
48% |
— |
4% |
SurveyUSA |
October 27–29, 2014 |
618 |
± 4% |
44% |
46% |
5%[42] |
5% |
Vox Populi Polling |
October 26–27, 2014 |
642 |
± 3.9% |
43% |
46% |
— |
10% |
Quinnipiac University |
October 22–27, 2014 |
844 |
± 3.4% |
39% |
46% |
8%[43] |
7% |
41% |
49% |
2% |
9% |
Strategies 360 |
October 20–25, 2014 |
604 |
± 4% |
45% |
44% |
4% |
8% |
Rasmussen Reports |
October 21–23, 2014 |
966 |
± 3% |
45% |
51% |
2% |
2% |
Harstad Strategic Research |
October 19–23, 2014 |
1,004 |
± ? |
44% |
43% |
6% |
6% |
CBS News/NYT/YouGov |
October 16–23, 2014 |
1,611 |
± 4% |
47% |
46% |
1% |
6% |
NBC News/Marist |
October 18–22, 2014 |
755 LV |
± 3.6% |
45% |
46% |
3% |
5% |
953 RV |
± 3.2% |
45% |
44% |
3% |
8% |
Suffolk University |
October 18–21, 2014 |
500 |
± 4.4% |
38.6% |
46% |
6%[44] |
9.4% |
Quinnipiac University |
October 15–21, 2014 |
974 |
± 3.1% |
41% |
46% |
6%[45] |
6% |
44% |
48% |
2% |
7% |
Monmouth University |
October 17–20, 2014 |
431 |
± 4.7% |
46% |
47% |
4% |
3% |
IPSOS |
October 13–20, 2014 |
1,099 |
± 3.4% |
45% |
47% |
— |
8% |
Public Policy Polling |
October 16–19, 2014 |
778 |
± 3.5% |
43% |
46% |
5%[46] |
7% |
44% |
47% |
— |
9% |
Gravis Marketing |
October 16, 2014 |
695 |
± 4% |
43% |
48% |
4%[47] |
5% |
Benenson Strategy Group |
October 15–16, 2014 |
600 |
± ? |
47% |
44% |
1% |
8% |
Mellman Group |
October 13–15, 2014 |
800 |
± 3.5% |
44% |
41% |
— |
15% |
CNN/ORC |
October 9–13, 2014 |
665 |
± 4% |
46% |
50% |
— |
4% |
Quinnipiac University |
October 8–13, 2014 |
988 |
± 3.1% |
41% |
47% |
8%[45] |
4% |
44% |
49% |
1% |
7% |
SurveyUSA |
October 9–12, 2014 |
591 |
± 4.1% |
43% |
45% |
6%[48] |
7% |
High Point University |
October 4–8, 2014 |
800 |
± 3.5% |
42% |
46% |
7% |
5% |
Fox News |
October 4–7, 2014 |
739 |
± 3.5% |
37% |
43% |
7% |
12% |
Greenberg Quinlan Rosner |
September 25–October 1, 2014 |
1,000 |
± 2.09% |
45% |
45% |
10% |
CBS News/NYT/YouGov |
September 20–October 1, 2014 |
1,634 |
± 3% |
48% |
45% |
1% |
6% |
Rasmussen Reports |
September 29–30, 2014 |
950 |
± 3% |
47% |
48% |
2% |
3% |
Public Policy Polling |
September 19–21, 2014 |
652 |
± 3.8% |
45% |
47% |
— |
8% |
ccAdvertising |
September 19–21, 2014 |
2,094 |
± ? |
32% |
38% |
— |
30% |
Gravis Marketing |
September 16–17, 2014 |
657 |
± 4% |
39% |
46% |
6% |
9% |
Suffolk University |
September 9–16, 2014 |
500 |
± 4.4% |
41.6% |
42.6% |
5.8%[49] |
10% |
Quinnipiac |
September 10–15, 2014 |
1,211 |
± 2.8% |
40% |
48% |
8%[45] |
3% |
42% |
52% |
1% |
5% |
Myers |
September 7–14, 2014 |
1,350 |
± 2.7% |
48% |
46% |
2% |
3% |
SurveyUSA |
September 8–10, 2014 |
664 |
± 3.9% |
46% |
42% |
5%[50] |
7% |
Rasmussen Reports |
September 3–4, 2014 |
800 |
± 4% |
44% |
42% |
4% |
10% |
NBC News/Marist |
September 2–4, 2014 |
795 LV |
± 3.5% |
48% |
42% |
1% |
9% |
976 RV |
± 3.1% |
48% |
40% |
1% |
11% |
CBS News/NYT/YouGov |
August 18–September 2, 2014 |
1,727 |
± 4% |
46% |
43% |
2% |
9% |
CBS News/New York Times |
July 5–24, 2014 |
2,020 |
± 3% |
50% |
46% |
2% |
2% |
Public Policy Polling |
July 17–20, 2014 |
653 |
± 3.8% |
44% |
43% |
— |
13% |
Quinnipiac |
July 10–14, 2014 |
1,147 |
± 2.9% |
42% |
44% |
1% |
13% |
Gravis Marketing |
July 7–10, 2014 |
1,106 |
± 3% |
43% |
47% |
6%[47] |
4% |
NBC News/Marist |
July 7–10, 2014 |
914 |
± 3.2% |
48% |
41% |
2% |
10% |
Rasmussen Reports |
June 25–26, 2014 |
750 |
± 4% |
43% |
42% |
6% |
9% |
Magellan Strategies |
June 6–8, 2014 |
747 |
± 3.54% |
45% |
47% |
— |
8% |
Public Policy Polling |
May 7–8, 2014 |
526 |
± ? |
47% |
43% |
— |
10% |
Quinnipiac |
April 15–21, 2014 |
1,298 |
± 2.7% |
45% |
44% |
1% |
9% |
Public Policy Polling |
April 17–20, 2014 |
618 |
± ? |
47% |
45% |
— |
8% |
Fabrizio, Lee & Associates |
April 16–17, 2014 |
600 |
± 4% |
42% |
44% |
7%[47] |
7% |
Magellan Strategies |
April 14–15, 2014 |
717 |
± 3.7% |
45% |
42% |
5% |
8% |
Harper Polling |
April 7–9, 2014 |
507 |
± 4.35% |
45% |
43% |
— |
12% |
Public Policy Polling |
March 13–16, 2014 |
568 |
± 4.1% |
42% |
40% |
— |
17% |
Harper Polling |
March 8–9, 2014 |
689 |
± ? |
45% |
44% |
— |
17% |
Rasmussen Reports |
March 5–6, 2014 |
500 |
± 4.5% |
42% |
41% |
5% |
13% |
Public Policy Polling |
April 11–14, 2013 |
500 |
± 4.4% |
49% |
39% |
— |
12% |
Hypothetical polling
|
Poll source |
Date(s)
administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Mark
Udall (D) |
Mark
Aspiri (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Quinnipiac |
November 15–18, 2013 |
1,206 |
± 2.8% |
45% |
36% |
1% |
17% |
Poll source |
Date(s)
administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Mark
Udall (D) |
Randy
Baumgardner (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
March 13–16, 2014 |
568 |
± 4.1% |
44% |
37% |
— |
19% |
Quinnipiac |
January 29–February 2, 2014 |
1,139 |
± 2.9% |
43% |
41% |
1% |
15% |
Public Policy Polling |
December 3–4, 2013 |
928 |
± 3.2% |
47% |
40% |
— |
13% |
Quinnipiac |
November 15–18, 2013 |
1,206 |
± 2.8% |
44% |
39% |
1% |
16% |
Poll source |
Date(s)
administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Mark
Udall (D) |
Bob
Beauprez (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
April 11–14, 2013 |
500 |
± 4.4% |
48% |
41% |
— |
11% |
Poll source |
Date(s)
administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Mark
Udall (D) |
Ken
Buck (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Hickman Analytics |
February 17–20, 2014 |
400 |
± 4.9% |
46% |
42% |
— |
12% |
Quinnipiac |
January 29–February 2, 2014 |
1,139 |
± 2.9% |
45% |
42% |
1% |
13% |
Public Policy Polling |
December 3–4, 2013 |
928 |
± 3.2% |
46% |
42% |
— |
12% |
Quinnipiac |
November 15–18, 2013 |
1,206 |
± 2.8% |
45% |
42% |
1% |
12% |
Public Policy Polling |
June 14–17, 2012 |
799 |
± 3.5% |
50% |
35% |
— |
15% |
Poll source |
Date(s)
administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Mark
Udall (D) |
Mike
Coffman (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
June 14–17, 2012 |
799 |
± 3.5% |
48% |
39% |
— |
13% |
Public Policy Polling |
December 1–4, 2011 |
793 |
± 3.5% |
48% |
34% |
— |
18% |
Poll source |
Date(s)
administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Mark
Udall (D) |
Scott
Gessler (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
April 11–14, 2013 |
500 |
± 4.4% |
50% |
37% |
— |
13% |
Poll source |
Date(s)
administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Mark
Udall (D) |
Owen
Hill (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
March 13–16, 2014 |
568 |
± 4.1% |
43% |
38% |
— |
19% |
Quinnipiac |
January 29–February 2, 2014 |
1,139 |
± 2.9% |
44% |
39% |
1% |
16% |
Public Policy Polling |
December 3–4, 2013 |
928 |
± 3.2% |
44% |
37% |
— |
18% |
Quinnipiac |
November 15–18, 2013 |
1,206 |
± 2.8% |
45% |
39% |
1% |
16% |
Poll source |
Date(s)
administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Mark
Udall (D) |
Doug
Lamborn (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
June 14–17, 2012 |
799 |
± 3.5% |
49% |
36% |
— |
15% |
Poll source |
Date(s)
administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Mark
Udall (D) |
Jaime
McMillan (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Quinnipiac |
January 29–February 2, 2014 |
1,139 |
± 2.9% |
45% |
38% |
1% |
16% |
Quinnipiac |
November 15–18, 2013 |
1,206 |
± 2.8% |
43% |
40% |
1% |
17% |
Poll source |
Date(s)
administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Mark
Udall (D) |
Bill
Owens (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
June 14–17, 2012 |
799 |
± 3.5% |
47% |
43% |
— |
10% |
Poll source |
Date(s)
administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Mark
Udall (D) |
Walker
Stapleton (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
April 11–14, 2013 |
500 |
± 4.4% |
50% |
37% |
— |
13% |
Poll source |
Date(s)
administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Mark
Udall (D) |
Amy
Stephens (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Quinnipiac |
January 29–February 2, 2014 |
1,139 |
± 2.9% |
43% |
41% |
1% |
15% |
Public Policy Polling |
December 3–4, 2013 |
928 |
± 3.2% |
44% |
37% |
— |
19% |
Quinnipiac |
November 15–18, 2013 |
1,206 |
± 2.8% |
45% |
38% |
1% |
16% |
Poll source |
Date(s)
administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Mark
Udall (D) |
John
Suthers (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
April 11–14, 2013 |
500 |
± 4.4% |
50% |
38% |
— |
12% |
Public Policy Polling |
June 14–17, 2012 |
799 |
± 3.5% |
48% |
38% |
— |
14% |
Poll source |
Date(s)
administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Mark
Udall (D) |
Tom
Tancredo (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
April 11–14, 2013 |
500 |
± 4.4% |
51% |
39% |
— |
11% |
Public Policy Polling |
June 14–17, 2012 |
799 |
± 3.5% |
49% |
39% |
— |
11% |
Poll source |
Date(s)
administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Mark
Udall (D) |
Scott
Tipton (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
April 11–14, 2013 |
500 |
± 4.4% |
50% |
37% |
— |
13% |
|
Results
See also
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
Cite error: Invalid <references>
tag; parameter "group" is allowed only.
Use <references />
, or <references group="..." />
External links
|
U.S.
Senate |
|
U.S.
House |
|
Governors |
|
Mayors |
- Alexandria, LA
- Jackson, MS
- Louisville, KY
- New Orleans, LA
- Newark, NJ
- Oakland, CA
- San Diego, CA
- San Jose, CA
- Shreveport, LA
- Washington, D.C.
|
States |
|
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 CO - Election Results
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Schrader, Megan. Republican Owen Hill plans to make bid for Mark Udall's U.S. Senate seat 8 June 2013. Retrieved 9 June 2013.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Schaffer, Beauprez, Brophy keeping 2014 options open | KDVR.com
- ↑ 22.0 22.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 24.0 24.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 31.0 31.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 34.0 34.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Raúl Acosta (I) 1%, Bill Hammons (UP) 0%, Gaylon Kent (L) 2%, Steve Shogan (I) 0%
- ↑ Steve Shogan (I) 6%, Other 1%
- ↑ Gaylon Kent (L) 2%, Steve Shogan (I) 3%
- ↑ Steve Shogan (I) 7%, Other 1%
- ↑ Raúl Acosta (I) 1.2%, Bill Hammons (UP) 0.6%, Gaylon Kent (L) 2.6%, Steve Shogan (I) 1.6%
- ↑ 45.0 45.1 45.2 Steve Shogan (I)
- ↑ Raúl Acosta (I) 1%, Bill Hammons (UP) 1%, Gaylon Kent (L) 2%, Steve Shogan (I) 1%
- ↑ 47.0 47.1 47.2 Gaylon Kent (L)
- ↑ Gaylon Kent (L) 3%, Steve Shogan (I) 2%
- ↑ Raúl Acosta (I) 0.8%, Bill Hammons (UP) 1.2%, Gaylon Kent (L) 2.4%, Steve Shogan (I) 1.4%
- ↑ Gaylon Kent (L) 2%, Steve Shogan (I) 3%
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.